BLOGGER TEMPLATES - TWITTER BACKGROUNDS

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Holy Crap!!: Asteroid Detonates Above Indonesia and No One Saw It


Did you know on October 8th, 2009 an asteroid exploded, releasing about 3x the energy of the Hiroshima atomic bomb, high in the atmosphere above Indonesia?


No? It's because literally no one saw it coming.

About 15-20 kilometers into the atmosphere, the explosion caused no damage on Earth, but witnesses could see a dust trail consistent with asteroid explosion. Nuclear explosion instruments around the world picked up the infrasound waves that resulted from the release of energy. The object is estimated to be about 10 meters across, as calculated by its energy output. No telescope saw it and that typically telescopes don't normally pick up objects less than a 100meters across-- only a small fraction of cataloged objects fit this description. However, it can take as little as 20-30 meter diameter object to cause major damage on Earth.

Ultimately, in order to find smaller objects we have to build larger, more powerful telescopes--a multibillion dollar endeavor. I think I'd rather spend a billion plus dollars than get squashed by a giant flying rock.



Using Women's Stockings as Whale Pregnancy Tests


As big as whales are, they are pretty hard to study and keep track of. Most techniques require to kill them in order to examine them. However, scientists think they have developed a way for them to collect biological samples from these animals test to see if they are pregnant or just horny.



Presumably, this would be a relatively simple, cheap and non-invasive way to get more information. To test this method, researchers in Austrailia collected 35 samples from two types of whales. They attached a stocking to a pole and then dangled it over the animals' blowhole when they came up for air. Tada! Whale blow soaked nylons!

Although scientists originally thought whale blow was simply air and water, it actually includes lung mucus. So instead of whales simply blowing air out, they are actually sort of sneezing. Measurable levels of the hormones progesterone and testosterone were also present in the blow, allowing scientists to figure out the sexual health of the animal.

For example, whales that were coming back from tropical waters, where they are thought to breed and bore offspring actually were still hormonally in the breeding period. In the long term sense, scientists hope to discover why certain whales are unable to breed.


Thursday, October 22, 2009

I'm Addicted to Cheesecake...Literally.

We've all had those moments, where we've eaten an entire package of oreos, a pint of ice cream or huge super-sized meal from McDonald's.



New research from the Scripps Research Institute in Florida suggests that junk food addiction is surprisingly similar to drug addiction.

Rats were split into two groups: Controls which had high-nutrient/low-cal diets or Junkies who were given unlimited junk food bought in a local grocery store (ie bacon, cheesecake, ho-hos, sausage, etc.). As expected, the junkie rats quickly became obese and compulsive eaters.

The rats were then allowed to control the pleasure center of their brains (also associated with drug addiction) by running on a wheel. The more they ran, the better they felt. Rats on the high fat diet ran more demonstrating that they need more stimulation in order to feel pleasure.

To see how strong the urge to eat junk food was, the rats were shocked whenever they ate high-fat foods. Control rats refused to eat the food again after one shock. However, the obese rats continually ate despite the repeated discomfort.

Furthermore, when the rats were put back onto the strict control diet, they had much difficulty adjusting. Formerly junky rats refused to eat their new food and starved themselves for two weeks.

Scientists are now interested in seeing if the eating habits of these junky rats are affected in the long term sense.


Put THAT away!: Can Men Control Their Arousal?

As both sexes can know unwelcomed...um...boners are awkward. Super awkward. I know most girls assume that this an uncontrolled response. Sexyness = erection. However, what if men can control it?


Then they'd be liars and or too lazy to bother.

Researchers showed men 16 random clips of which 8 were erotic and 8 were funny featuring comedian Mitch Hedberg (to remove the accidental sexy factor). The participants were then ordered to control their response to certain videos while freely watching others. They then were asked to rate their arousal. Also during the study, there were hooked to machines measuring their erections.

On average, men were able to control their response when asked, resulting in about a 25% decrease in erectile response. One scientist notes that "This is consistent with success rates from previous, well-controlled [measuring-device] faking studies in which success rates range from 26 to 38 percent." Men who were able to control themselves when watching porn videos also able to do so while watching Mitch Hedberg.

“The finding that was most surprising was that some men became more sexually aroused when they tried to regulate their sexual arousal,” Winters says. “In other words, they responded more strongly (both physiologically and self-reported) during trials in which they attempted to regulate their arousal than trials during which they merely watched the stimuli. We attributed this increased response to anxiety — in this case, demand anxiety. It’s sort of like when you tell someone not to think of a white elephant; those [who] are most anxious during the task have the most trouble not thinking about the white elephant.”

It appeared that the factors that DID NOT affect ability to regulate were:
-sexual experience
-sexual compulsivity
-age
However, the following factors DID affect it:
-sexual excitability
-desire
-inhibition

So the next time girls, when they say "I can't help it!" just go "Maybe you aren't trying hard enough!!"



Thursday, October 15, 2009

I CAN STOP LIFE!: Using hydrogen sulfide to halt cell activity

If you read this blog regularly, we've been a little lax in posting lately. Really, there's hasn't been anything reported that's interesting in science going on. I know, you'd think that was impossible.

---------------------------------------------------------
If you've ever taken a chemistry class, you've probably gotten a whiff of H2S, or hydrogen sulfide. And if you don't know what I'm talking about, it smells like rotten eggs. I bet you know what I'm talking about now.

In low doses, H2S gas is tolerable. Hydrogen sulfide is naturally occurring, so your body can process lower levels. In high doses, it will kill you. The toxicity comes from the gas binding to your enzymes instead of oxygen. And you sorta need oxygen to live.

Scientists are now experimenting with the deadly gas in order to stop cell growth and further the field of emergency medicine. A recent breakthrough has been that death isn't caused be oxygen deprivation directly, but falling oxygen levels set off deadly reactions. However, hydrogen sulfide can replace the oxygen and stop the reactions before they occur.

Experiments with fish embryos showed that removing oxygen from their cells left them in suspension. When oxygen was added back, they cells simply continued to grow as normal without any difference. Next, fruit flies were gassed with H2S. They also stopped moving but started up again over oxygen was added back.

The theory is that we need at least 21% oxygen to live (this is the composition of the air we breathe) and die at 5%. However, at .1% cells appear to simply stop, not die. As you can imagine, this can revolutionize medicine as we no longer need to race against time, but just pause it. However, research is having a problem achieving this suspended animation with big animals. Currently, they are developing an injectable drug that will dissolve in the blood to release H2S.

As reported from CNN.

Thursday, October 8, 2009

Wait.. We are Bombing the Moon!?


A crater toward the Moon's south pole is currently targeted by a missle (called the Centaur rocket) in hopes of figuring out if the Moon could be a potential future source of water.

Science Fan James Howard says, "Bombing the moon will be sweet because it will show any aliens watching that we mean business . . . my sources have also said that we could be secretly laying the foundation for a moon golf course or mini-golf course, which would also be sweet."

The impact is expected to be so powerful that a very large amount of debris will be ejected. Although the surface of the moon has been determined to be mostly a desert like environment (dry and airless), scientists believe there could be a basin of ice trapped in the crater where the Centaur rocket is being aimed. If there is ice it could be enough water to fill one of Europe's largest reservoirs providing a temporary fix to the diminishing water supply globally.

Following close behind the missile is a shepherding space craft that will be used to take pictures of the impact as well as monitor the
missile's activity. At the same time a satellite is being launched that is designed to orbit the Moon for at least a year searching for potential landing sites for astronauts for return missions and monitor the area for suitable conditions to support a colony.

Coincidently, China's is also sending a probe that is scheduled to crash into the moon this week. Hopefully we know what we are doing. The poor moon.

Source: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=nasas-mission-to-bomb-the-moon-2009-06

Some people don't like this idea: http://donotbombthemoon.wordpress.com/

Astronomers on Verge of Finding Earth's Twin

ARTICLE TAKEN FROM: http://www.livescience.com/space/080624-st-planet-tally.html

" Planet hunters say it's just a matter of time before they lasso Earth's twin, which almost surely is hiding somewhere in our star-studded galaxy.

Momentum is building: Just last week, astronomers announced they had discovered three super-Earths — worlds more massive than ours but small enough to most likely be rocky — orbiting a single star. And dozens of other worlds suspected of having masses in that same range were found around other stars.

"Being able to find three Earth-mass planets around a single star really makes the point that not only may many stars have one Earth, but they may very well have a couple of Earths," said Alan Boss, a planet formation theorist at the Carnegie Institution of Washington in Washington, D.C.

Since the early 1990s, when the first planets outside of our solar system were detected orbiting the pulsar PSR 1257, astronomers have identified nearly 300 such worlds. However, most of them are gas giants called hot Jupiters that orbit close to their stars because, simply, they are easier to find.

"So far we've found Jupiters and Saturns, and now our technology is becoming good enough to detect planets smaller, more like the size of Uranus and Neptune, and even smaller," said one of the top planet hunters on this world, Geoff Marcy of the University of California, Berkeley.

Marcy, Boss and other scientists are optimistic that within the next five or so years headlines will be splashed with news of a near twin of Earth in another star system.

"What is amazing to me is that for thousands of years humans have gazed at the stars, wondering if there might be another Earth out there somewhere," Boss told SPACE.com. "Now we know enough to say that Earth-like planets are indeed orbiting many of those stars, unseen perhaps, but there nevertheless."

Seeing tiny planets

Two techniques are now standard for spotting other worlds. Most of the planets noted to date have been discovered using the radial velocity method, in which astronomers look for slight wobbles in a star's motion due to the gravitational tug of an orbiting planet. This favors detection of very massive planets that are very close to their host stars.

With the transit method, astronomers watch for a dimming of light when a planet passes in front of its host star. Though more haphazard, this approach works when telescopes scan the light from hundreds or thousands of stars at once.

Both methods are limited by their ability to block out the overshadowing light of the host star. For instance, the sun is 100 times larger, 300,000 times more massive and up to 10 billion times brighter than Earth. "Detecting Earth in reflected light is like searching for a firefly six feet from a searchlight that is 2,400 miles distant," writes a panel of astronomers recently in their final report of the Exoplanet Task Force.

With upgrades in spectrometers and digital cameras attached to telescopes, astronomers' eyes have become more sensitive to relatively tiny stellar wobbles (measured by changes in certain wavelengths of light) and dips in starlight from ever smaller planets.

The discovery of super-Earths announced last week reflects this technological leap.

"I think why astronomers are really excited [about the super-Earth discovery] is it just shows that technology has really matured and so they're able to see these very subtle wobbles due to these low-mass planets," said David Charbonneau of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Massachusetts. "Those were fairly massive stars. If they were able to get the same precision on a lower-mass star, they would be able to look at even lower-mass planets and so those really would be analogs of the Earth."

The fast track

To eke out even more sensitivity from current technologies, Charbonneau suggests astronomers look for worlds around small stars.

He and other astronomers are in fact probing the universe for transiting planets orbiting M dwarfs, or red dwarfs, which are about 50 percent dimmer than the sun and much less massive. Red dwarfs are also considered the most common star type in the universe.

"I think the real opportunity there is to study low-mass stars, and that's because we're looking for very small planets," Charbonneau said. "The difficulty is the ratio between the planet's mass and the star's mass or the planet's size and the star's size depending on how you want to find it."

The low mass and luminosity means any changes to the star due to an Earth-mass planet are much more likely to be detected.

"A late M star is about 10 times smaller than the sun," said Penn State's James Kasting, who studies planetary atmospheres and the habitable zones of exoplanets. "So Earth going in front of an M star would give a 1 percent signal. That's like Jupiter going in front of the sun." Kasting added, "We could conceivably find an Earth analog planet by this method within the next five or ten years."

Other teams are gearing up to look for Earth-like worlds orbiting massive stars like the sun. NASA's Kepler observatory is scheduled for launch in February 2009, after which the high-powered telescope will monitor about 100,000 stars in the Milky Way looking for periodic dimming of starlight due to a planet's transit in front of the star.

The French COROT mission is already up in space working in a similar fashion.

Good hunting

The ultimate goal of planet-hunting projects is to find Earth twins.

"We are looking for twins of the Earth, analogs that walk and talk and smell like our own Earth," Marcy said during a telephone interview. He is currently looking for super-Earths using the W.M. Keck Observatory in Hawaii.

Such a twin would be rocky, with a similar chemical composition to Earth, and would orbit within the habitable zone of its star.

The habitable zone defines the distance at which a planet must orbit from its star for liquid water to exist on its surface — not too hot like Venus, not too cold like Neptune or Pluto.

Astronomers have found planets orbiting pretty close to the habitable zone, but none so far within it.

"I suspect there are Earth-like planets with lakes and rivers and waterfalls and deep glacial gorges and that are spectacularly beautiful," Marcy said.

Life beyond Earth

Finding a planet in the habitable zone is the first step toward finding alien life.

"When we say it's a habitable world, all we're doing is saying it potentially could hold life," Boss said. "To go beyond that to say, 'Here's a habitable world; is it inhabited,' then you need to start studying the atmosphere of the planet."

The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), scheduled for launch in 2013, could do just that.

"There might be a signal in the atmosphere that could be a smoking gun and would suggest that plate tectonics is there," said earth and planetary scientist Diana Valencia of Harvard University.

Her computer models have shown that plate tectonics, the forces that move continents and lift gigantic mountain ranges, are key to life on Earth as we know it, and possibly to life on other worlds. That's because as the rocky plates that form the planet's outer shell move about, they also recycle carbon dioxide. This greenhouse gas keeps our planet's temperature balmy, but not too hot. And the telltale signal would be certain levels of carbon dioxide, suggesting that just as on Earth, this other world relies on plate tectonics to cycle carbon.

But first things first. "There's no doubt that other Earths exist, simply due to the sheer vast numbers of other stars and galaxies in our universe," Marcy said. "There's a deeper question — how common are Earth-like planets? Are Earth-like planets a dime a dozen, or are they quite rare, quirky precious planets that are one in a thousand or one in a million?" "


Top 10 Deadliest Animals



SAME ARTICLE FOUND HERE: http://www.livescience.com/animals/top10_deadliestanimals-1.html


"NUMBER 10: Poision Dart Frogs
These pint sized frogs aren't for kissing. Their backs ooze a slimy neurotoxin that is meant to keep predators away. Each frog produces enough of the toxin to kill 10 humans.

NUMBER 9: Cape Buffalo
When faced with a predator, cape buffaloes charge head on. That's 1,500 pounds of beast topped off with two big, sharp horns. You're lucky if there's only one - the real danger comes when a herd of thousands stampedes in your direction.

NUMBER 8: Polar Bear
Sure they might look cuddly at the zoo, but in the wild they eat elephant seals for breakfast. Get between one and its cub and it could easily rip off your head with one swipe of its giant paw.

NUMBER 7: Elephant
Not every elephant is as friendly as Dumbo. Elephants kill more than 500 people a year worldwide. African elephants generally weigh in around 16,000 pounds - all the better to stomp you with - not to mention their sharp tusks.

NUMBER 6: Australian Saltwater Crocodile
Don't mistake this croc for a log! It can lay still in the water, waiting for passers by. Then, in the blink of an eye, it'll lunge at prey, pulling it under water to drown and dismember.

NUMBER 5: African Lion
Giant fangs? Check. Lightning quick? That too. Razor sharp claws? You betcha. Hungry? You better hope not. These big cats are near perfect hunters.

NUMBER 4: Great White Shark
Blood in the water can excite these sharks into a feeding frenzy, where they'll use all 3,000 of their teeth to bite anything that moves.

NUMBER 3: Australian Box Jellyfish
Also known as the sea wasp, this salad-bowl sized jellyfish can have up to 60 tentacles each 15 feet long. Each tentacle has 5,000 stinging cells and enough toxin to kill 60 humans.

NUMBER 2: Asian Cobra
While the Asian Cobra doesn't hold the title of most venomous snake, it does the most with what it has. Of the 50,000 deaths by snakebite a year, Asian Cobras are responsible for the largest chunk.

NUMBER 1: Mosquito
Most skeeter bites just make you itch. But some mosquitoes carry and transfer malaria causing parasites. As a result, these little pests are responsible for the deaths of more than two million people a year. "

Thank you LiveScience.

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

"What's Inside A Cup of Coffee?"

You probably don't think about what's really in your morning cup of coffee other than it warm, caffeine goodness. Well Wired Magazine wrote an article so you know:

Caffeine
This is why the world produces more than 16 billion pounds of coffee beans per year. It's actually an alkaloid plant toxin (like nicotine and cocaine), a bug killer that stimulates us by blocking neuroreceptors for the sleep chemical adenosine. The result: you, awake.

Water

Hot H2O is a super solvent, leaching flavors and oils out of the coffee bean. A good cup of joe is 98.75 percent water and 1.25 percent soluble plant matter. Caffeine is a diuretic, so coffee newbies pee out the water quickly; java junkies build up resistance.

2-Ethylphenol

Creates a tarlike, medicinal odor in your morning wake-up. It's also a component of cockroach alarm pheromones, chemical signals that warn the colony of danger.

Quinic acid
Gives coffee its slightly sour flavor. On the plus side, it's one of the starter chemicals in the formulation of Tamiflu.

3,5 Dicaffeoylquinic acid
When scientists pretreat neurons with this acid in the lab, the cells are significantly (though not completely) protected from free-radical damage. Yup: Coffee is a good source of antioxidants.

Dimethyl disulfide
A product of roasting the green coffee bean, this compound is just at the threshold of detectability in brewed java. Good thing, too, as it's one of the compounds that gives human feces its odor.

Acetylmethylcarbinol
That rich, buttery taste in your daily jolt comes in part from this flammable yellow liquid, which helps give real butter its flavor and is a component of artificial flavoring in microwave popcorn.

Putrescine
Ever wonder what makes spoiled meat so poisonous? Here you go. Ptomaines like putrescine are produced when E. coli bacteria in the meat break down amino acids. Naturally present in coffee beans, it smells, as you might guess from the name, like Satan's outhouse.

Trigonelline
Chemically, it's a molecule of niacin with a methyl group attached. It breaks down into pyridines, which give coffee its sweet, earthy taste and also prevent the tooth-eating bacterium Streptococcus mutans from attaching to your teeth. Coffee fights the Cavity Creeps.

Niacin
Trigonelline is unstable above 160 degrees F; the methyl group detaches, unleashing the niacin—vitamin B3—into your cup. Two or three espressos can provide half your recommended daily allowance.

Monday, October 5, 2009

Feeling Guilty is Good for You.

For a long time, I have known that sometimes you can't seem motivate yourself to do something until it becomes completely necessary. You don't learn a lot of easy things until you are studying for finals and you learn to brush your teeth because you get cavities. Consequences drive action. Topic: Evidence feeling guilty is good for you.

Researchers all around the world are finding people that drink to excess, also seem to lead active lifestyles and exercising more then the non-drinker. This article is one of many talking about how people who drink more often tend to exerciser more often. Evidence number one that guilt is good for you. Sure, you are drinking and potentially causing irreversible liver damage, but your heart is going to be in amazing shape. You feel guilty that you are hurting your body, so you compensate to make up for it. Yay for drinking!

I cam across another article titled, "Recession may boost Life-expectancy." This counter intuitive conclusion that has no clear explanation, but I would like to pretend that people get so worried about disaster that they live healthier and more efficiently. You would assume the stress and lowered levels of sleep would make life expectancy go down, but I think the guilt of an excessive lifestyle gets to people and it helps everyone realize the way they should be living in times like these.

There is a book by Micheal Crichton called "State of Fear" where the heros are trying to stop these radical environmentalist who try and make it seem like the world is falling apart because people will be driven to help their cause because they are terrified of the disasters they create . It is a pretty cool book. I think it is a similar idea though and basically people come together in times of stress and feeling guilty about something is a feeling we should embrace. The day after I take a 'sick' day, I always try and work harder. So maybe one day my whole life will be in order, and it will maybe from overwhelming guilt?

Sunday, October 4, 2009

Ig Nobel Award Winners 2009

Every year the Annals of Improbable Research hand out the Ig Nobel awards in various categories to research that "celebrate the unusual, honor the imaginative--and spurs people's interest in science, medicine and technology." Without further ado, here is the research winners of 2009:


  • Veterinary Science- Newcastle University scientists from the UK found that named cows give more milk than anonymous ones because monikered cows receive more personal attention.
  • Peace-University of Bern scientists from Switzerland questioned which is better to smash a person's skull in--a full bottle of beer or an empty one? (Answer:Both can fracture a skull, but a full one is more likely to break open on the person )
  • Economics-Banks of Iceland for "demonstrating that tiny banks can be rapidly transformed into huge banks, and vice versa--and showing that similar things can be done on an entire national economy."
  • Chemistry- Scientists from Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico prove you can grow diamonds from tequila.
  • Medicine- A man from California tested the theory whether knuckle cracking leads to arthritis by cracking his left hand knuckles every day for 60 years and never on his right. He currently does not have arthritis.
  • Physics- Scientists from University of Cincinnati analyzed why pregnant women don't fall forward due to their protruding stomachs and walking uprightly. It was found that women have a more significant curvature in their spine than men to balance out the weight.
  • Literature-Ireland's police, who wrote 50+ traffic tickets to Prawo Jazdy, whose name means "Driver's License" in Polish. It turns out Irish cops have been looking at Polish licenses thinking Prawo Jazdy was the driver's name.
  • Public Health- Three people from Chicago invented a bra that doubles as a gas mask for two people.
  • Mathematics- The governor of Zimbabwe's Reserve Bank who printed bills worth a penny to a hundred trillion dollars.
  • Biology- Scientists from Kitasato University found that kitchen waste can reduce up to 90% in mass by using bacteria from panda poop.

Friday, October 2, 2009

I'd Rather It Rain Men Than Rocks

In a galaxy far, far, away....there lies an exoplanet COROT-7b, which is 5x the mass of Earth and twice as large.


COROT-7b is a rocky planet like Earth and calculations show its density is also comparable to ours, meaning that it is most likely made of silicate rock's like the Earth's crust. However, this planet is only 1.6mil miles from its sun, 23x closer than Mercury is to our sun. And as you can imagine, it can get pretty hot. Hot enough to vaporize rocks.