BLOGGER TEMPLATES - TWITTER BACKGROUNDS

Friday, December 11, 2009

"More than 1,000 Catfish species are venomous"


Watch out, sucka!!
We can now add catfish to the lust of animals can kill us.

Like most animals, the catfish uses its venom as a defense mechanism. The effects can range from a slight sting to...well, dying.


"Catfish venom glands are found alongside sharp, bony spines on the edges of the dorsal and pectoral fins, and these spines can be locked into place when the catfish is threatened. When a spine jabs a potential predator, the membrane surrounding the venom gland cells is torn, releasing venom into the wound.

Catfish venom poisons a victim's nerves and breaks down red blood cells, producing such effects as severe pain, reduced blood flow, muscle spasms and respiratory distress.

The main dangers to humans from North American catfish, however, come not from the initial sting and inflammation, but from secondary bacterial and fungal infections that can be introduced through the puncture wound or when pieces of the spine and other tissue break off in the wound, said University of Michigan graduate student Jeremy Wright, who led the research."

Monday, December 7, 2009

The Science Behind Lotions

http://admin.moguling.com/Upload/haircareskincreams.com/SkinCreams.jpg

As a girl, I can't live without lotion. I have my day moisturizer, my night cream, my general body lotion then I have things like body cream and body butter. I'm sure boys think I'm speaking greek right now (I've never known a boy to use lotion), but I hate the feeling of tight, dry skin.

We know lotion is needed to add and keep moisture in our skin, but how does it work?

If you've ever had different types and brands of lotions (women, I'm looking at you), you know that some feel oily, greasy, creamy, etc. Well it seems the way it feels is dependent on temperature, the cream's friction and how fast we rub it into our skin. Currently, manufacturers decide how the lotions feel by focus groups that try them out.

Mechanical engineers at Ohio State University have been able to use science to collect qualitative data on how a cream feels on our skin. They use something called a atomic force microscope. Basically this instrument has a sharp point that rubs against the lotion sample and measures its friction. In the overall sense, this sharp point is suppose to represent one point on your skin. The resulting data gives researchers an idea of how the creams work with your skin. Unsurprisingly, they found thicker creams produce more friction, which in turn feels less smooth on your skin.

Companies are now using this information to create better products. Eventually Ohio U. scientists hope to find the exact mechanism in which creams work on our skin.




Sunday, December 6, 2009

Don't Injure Yourself This Holiday Season.


http://akalol.wordpress.com/2008/11/04/wrap-rage-comes-of-age/
In a July 2009 poll of adult Pennsylvanians, about 17% have been injured attempting to open factory packaging (not giftwrap) in which they needed medical attention.

In 2001, the Census Bureau said that twice has many people are hurt during wrap rage than skateboards or swimming pools.

As a result, ScienceDaily gives the following tips:
  1. If you use a knife or something sharp cut away from your body.
  2. Use blunt end scissors.
  3. Wear protective gloves.
  4. Avoid opening tough packaging in crowded areas.
  5. Don't use your legs to keep a product stable.
This entire article tells me two things. Either packages are becoming way too hard to open OR we are impatient raging idiots we can't think "Hmm maybe stabbing this plastic case in my lap is a bad idea."

Pennsylvania Medical Society (2009, December 6). Wrap rage: A holiday injury waiting to happen. ScienceDaily. Retrieved December 6, 2009, from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/12/091205175658.htm

Carnivorous Plants Could Be In Your Backyard


http://craziestgadgets.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/life-size-super-mario-plant.jpg


Although man-eating plants have been long debunked, carnivorous plants do exist. The most famous are the venus fly traps, but others include the pitcher plant and bromeliads. These plants eat insects in order to make up for nutrient deficiencies.

We would think that plants either eat insects or not. However, researchers believe this should be a sliding scale of carnivorous-ness. For example, petunias and potatoes have sticky hairs that catch insects, but do not digest them. They suggest that murderous plants are much more common and might digest the breakdown of their victims.

Wiley-Blackwell (2009, December 5). 'Killer petunias' should join the ranks of carnivorous plants, scientists propose. ScienceDaily. Retrieved December 6, 2009, from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/12/091204103747.htm

Thursday, December 3, 2009

Feeding the Birds Feeds Their Evolution

http://www.loughallenbasin.com/birds.html


Humans undeniably make a huge impact on the world. We are shaping the Earth's climate, its habitats and ultimately their inhabitants.

But did you ever think something as simple as throwing some crumbs to our feathered friends are driving their evolution? Probably not. Some birds have become so dependent on humans for food that is has changed their migratory pattern and their wing shapes.

Over 3.5 years, scientists in Germany studied the migratory patterns of birds called blackcaps. The birds has split into two groups with significant different routes. One set of birds migrated from Central Europe to southwestern Spain, the other to northwestern UK.

The newer pattern to the UK is shorter than to Spain. As a result, these lazier birds have rounder wings that give better maneuverability, but makes them ill-equiped for flying long distances. Their bills are also more narrow than their Spanish-destined counterparts who eat large fruit.

Surprisingly, these birds are raised in the same forest side by side but do not interbreed. The split into two distinct populations occurred in less than 30 generations.

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Break Out The Face Masks: Swine Flu Has Mutated

With all the hysteria concerning H1N1 aka swine flu, prepare for people to start barricading themselves in their houses:



Luckily, the strain found by China has an "isolated spread in the mainland" and is still susceptible to drugs and preventable by vaccine. Other information about the mutated strain--cases or deaths associated, where it was found, etc. has not been released.

The World Heath Organization (WHO) announced last week they were looking into a variant of the flu that may have caused two deaths and a severe case in Norway. This mutation isn't new--it has been found all over the world and in both mild and severe cases. However, Norway's Institute of Public Health announced this mutation may cause more severe disease by effectively infecting the deeper tissues in the airway.

The evolution and therefore mutation of viruses is not unusual. Viruses replicate incredibly fast and can infect many people easily. They must also be continuously evolving to stay ahead of the host cells. In particular RNA viruses have a high rate of mutation because they lack a way to correct any mutations. DNA replication has an enzyme that can go back, find and correct mutations that might have occured. To give you an sense of mutation rates, here are some stats according to Wikipedia (so take it with a grain of salt?):
-Eukaryotes (ex: humans, plants, animals) -.0010 to .00001 per base per generation
-Bacteria- .00000001 per base per generation
-DNA viruses (ex herpes virus, smallpox virus, human papillomavirus-HPV)- .000001 to .00000001 per base per generation
-RNA viruses (hepatitis, HIV, influenza, Norwalk virus)-.001 to .00001 per base per generation


Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Al Gore Stands Up For Climate Change

Al Gore, champion for climate change, decides to change the way he is promoting a greener future:





We should all start being a little green crazy.

Monday, November 23, 2009

O...M..G..-Comatose Man Was Actually Conscious For 23 years

Imagine being completely paralyzed in your body but fully conscious. You can hear everything going around you but you have no way to signal to the outside world that you are awake. This man did that (or rather nothing) for 23 years.


The man was involved in a 1983 car crash and diagnosed as being in a coma. Initial brain scans failed to pick-up his conscious brain activity. Both his family and caregivers attempted to communicate with him, but eventually gave up and assumed his vegetative state was permanent. Over the years, the doctors used the internationally used Glasgow Coma Scale to assess his condition. It tests eye, verbal and motor assessments to determine brain function, however, doctors still failed to miss signs his brain was fully functioning. Just three years ago, doctors used a "state of the art scanning system" that detected his consciousness.

Steven Laureys, a neurologist in Belgium says that of 44 diagnosed comatose patients he examined, 18 showed responses to communication. In about 40% of vegetative cases, closer examination shows a certain level of consciousness. He has also published a paper on the misdiagnoses of vegetative states.

This is not only TERRIFYING for the patient to be considered unresponsive by the outside world, but shines a new perspective on the decision for people who are considered comatose and are taken off life support. Eep.


Friday, November 20, 2009

It is coming people..

image source: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/03/science/03tier.html

For those of you who know me.. I am paranoid by a few things that are maybe slightly irrational. One: China controls the weather.. and may one day use it to control the world. Two: We make no sense if every reaction wants to achieve Entropy. Three, and most importantly for today, we are going to put ourselves in a matrix (UNLESS WE ARE ALREADY IN ONE!?). Okay.. point of today's entry is that Intel has announced that by 2020 chips in our brains will control computer.. not keyboards and computer mice (is that the plural of this kind of mouse?). The article is found here.

Basically, Researchers at Intel's research lab in Pittsburgh are attempting to decode brain waves and tagging them to meaning so someone could surf the Internet by the power of thought. The brain is too complicated for that you say? Well.. it does work the same way a computer does in many ways.. just a series of inputs and consequential outputs. The article details that when a person thinks about a bear or hears a bear growl.. similar brain waves and brain activity occurs. The chip would be surgically implanted and it would harness the power of your brain waves.

Sounds cool? But let us think about this for a minute. Pros.. education would be a Montessori school of wondrous exploration for the next generation. The concept that a child could explore every thought is intriguing and would produce a lot of very gifted people. Second, it would be absurd how much faster you could research something. For me.. I am a visual learner, and if I could just imagine what I was thinking of instead of verbalizing.. I would be in good business.
Cons.. this is a surgery plugging you into the Internet at all times. I like turning the computer off and reading.. if you had a surgery, I wonder if it would feel the same turning the computer off. Second, You think kids have no attention span? When there is so much information out there to explore and free TV online.. could you ever really focus on one thing? I am not sure I could. Third, there is equally as much bad information available to consume someone life online that is not productive.. deliciously trashy celebrity gossip.. crazy people's new religions.. etc. Would people ever come outside for the light of day.. the list goes on.

The article does bring up a good point that years ago if you said everyone would have a cell phone on them all the time, you would be looked at strangely and not conceive it as true. Cell phones are basically tiny computers with the iPhone's and g1's in the world. It is unavoidable to stop progress, and it may be inevitable to avoid embracing curiosity of a machine-human intelligence combination.. but I want to make mistakes and over sleep! I don't want to be a machine. Maybe I am alone. Here are some more articles for those interested. One, Two, and Three.

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

"Scientific concepts depicted with photos of everyday objects"


Taken directly from boingboing.net


Lee sez, "Kevin Van Aelst, who photographs household objects to explain basic life processes. He uses gummy worms for DNA, clothes for the heart and other things you'd find around the house."

While the depictions of information--such as an EKG, fingerprint, map or anatomical model--are unconventional, the truth and accuracy to the illustrations are just as valid as more traditional depictions. This work is about creating order where we expect to find randomness, and also hints that the minutiae all around us is capable of communicating much larger ideas.
Kevin Van Aelst (Thanks, Lee!)

Monday, November 16, 2009

Are You Hurting? Think of Someone You Love

In a recent study, women who held their boyfriend's hand while being subjected to "moderately painful heat stimuli" reported feeling less pain. The women were given the stimuli while holding their boyfriend's hand, a ball or a male stranger's hand.


In a second test, women were pained again, but while being shown a picture of a chair, a stranger or their boyfriend. Once again, those who were shown pictures of their boyfriends said they felt less pain.

As the article suggests:

The study was small, however, and more research would be needed to confirm the findings and figure out exactly what's going on. The results are detailed in the November 2009 issue of the journal Psychological Science.

Eisenberger and colleagues say the study suggests practical advice: If you're going through a stressful or painful experience, and you don't have a loved one handy, at least find a photo.


Jellyfish Don't Like Japan


Huge swarms of the Nomura jellyfish are threatening the livelihood of Japanese fisherman. These nasty suckers can grow up to 6ft in diameter and weigh up to 450 lbs and look like evil red-orange jello blobs. They easily get snagged in fishing nets and kill the little catch these fisherman are able to bring in.


This massive swarm is not local only to Japan, but is occurring thousands of miles off its coast. It has shut down desalination plants in the Middle East and Africa, killed off fishing industries and piss off beachgoers. This invasion used to be an every 40-yr occurance, but has slowly evolved into an annual event.

Why, you ask? Jellyfish steroids? Jelly take over? 2012 prophecy? Attack on Godzilla?

No..global warming. Warming of the oceans has allowed the jellyfish to spread and breed. Pollution also has increased the amount of plankton in the water, which provides even more food for these gelatinous bastards.

In Japan, these pests have cost the fishing industry upwards of ~$300 billion where upwards of 500 million of jellies have capsized boats from their weight in the nets and reduced daily catches by 30%.

Although scientists have shown a correlation between water temps and jellyfish population booms, there are other limiting factors such as food, currents and the temperature getting too high. One population decreased in the Bering Sea although there were record highs.


Sunday, November 15, 2009

"Humans Still Evolving as Our Brains Shrink "

There has been debate on whether or not humans are still evolving. The short answer, is yes we are, stupid.


Some changes are:
  • The human brain is shrinking. Using skull measurements, it shows that the brain has been getting smaller in the last 5,000 years--about 150 cubic cm, or "roughly 10%." This is true regardless of the population measured. Researchers theorize this is because of societal differences such as a movement away from the hunter-gatherer lifestyle and more specialization use of our brains. Basically, maybe we don't need all those extra brain space.
  • Humans have evolved some defenses against malaria. Malaria is caused by a parasite that is spread by mosquitoes, enters the bloodstream and infects red blood cells. One defense is sickle cell anemia, which deforms the cells and prevents parasitic infection. Interestingly, an Indian-Pakistani version has also evolved.
  • A lot of people are lactose intolerant, but lactose tolerance only evolved about 7,500 yrs ago in Europe so that we could take advantage of non-human milk. Also, some genes have shown to allow resistance to type II diabetes.
  • More analysis has shown that there has been many changes in our genome in the last 40,000 yrs. This may have be in response to our change in diet that used to be based on hunter-gatherers.

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Ew, Antarctica is Dirty: Antarctic Lakes Full of Viruses

Alcami and his colleagues analyzed DNA from viruses found in water samples collected fromAntarctica's Lake Limnopolar, a surface lake on Livingston Island. They found nearly 10,000 species, including some small DNA viruses that had never before been identified. In total, the viruses were from 12 different families, some of which may be completely new to science, the researchers suggest.

The results reveal this Antarctic lake supports a virus community that's more diverse than most aquatic environments studied in the world so far — a surprising find considering that the polar region is generally thought to have low biological diversity due to the extreme environmental conditions. The scientists speculate the newly discovered viruses may have adapted specifically to thrive in such harsh conditions.

The team also found the community of viruses changed dramatically depending on the season. When the lake was ice-covered in the spring, the liquid water under the ice was inhabited by mostly small viruses, but in the summer months when the ice melted, the lake was home to mostly larger viruses.

"It looks like a completely different lake in summer," Alcami said. The scientists think the shift might be due to an increase in algae in the summertime, which the larger viruses infect.

The researchers hope to figure out whether any of the viruses are unique to Antarctica. If so, that would shed light on whether microbial life evolved independently in Antarctica, which has been isolated for millions of years, or they were introduced there more recently.

PLUTO SPEAKS OUT: I'm a planet, damn it!

From the culturelab blog on New Scientist:


Pluto

Greetings, planet Earth. It's Pluto. Remember me? Ever since your astronomers had their "big meeting" in 2006, I've heard Earth dwellers saying I'm not a planet anymore, and I'm fed up.

At least I'm getting some respect in journalist Alan Boyle's new book, The Case for Pluto - a lot more than from some other authors I won't mention (you know who you are, Neil deGrasse Tyson). It's a great account of my place in history and culture, the science of the solar system, and the rough ride I've been getting recently.

Best of all, he's sympathetic to my cause and gives me credit for my planety features: I'm big enough for my own gravity to make me round and I have an atmosphere.

Still, one positive portrayal can't make up for all the criticism I get from Earth. I may be on the small side, but is that any reason to pick on me? Compared to Jupiter, you're small too, Earth! You say I can't be in the planet club because I haven't cleared my orbit of other objects.

Ok, sure, Neptune does cross my path from time to time. But look at all the asteroids in Earth's neighbourhood. I heard one of them crashed into you just the other day, and I hope it hit you in the eye!

If you're looking for an object that doesn't fit in, take a look in the mirror, Earth. You're the only solar system body whose surface is covered in liquid water. And you have a huge concentration of oxygen in your atmosphere - way more than any other solar system body.

While we're at it, let's talk about longevity, a topic I'm glad to see Boyle raises in his book. When the sun goes red giant in a few billion years, guess who's going to get burned to a crisp? That would be you, Earth. Meanwhile, I'll still be out here, keeping it real.

Planetarily yours,

Pluto (as told to David Shiga)

Cancer + Marraige = "Women More Loyal When Cancer Strikes"

A recent study showed that marriages affected by cancer and multiple sclerosis show a divorce rate of about 12%, which is the same as the normal population.



The study was done on 515 patients (about evenly split between the sexes) that were grouped by diagnosis-214 malignant primary brain tumor, 193 solid tumor unrelated to the central nervous system and 108 with multiple sclerosis. In all 3 types of disease, women consistently showed a higher divorce rate.

Researchers suggest women are more adaptable and committed to the role of caregiver than men.

"Part of it is a sense of self-preservation, and in men that seems to operate very highly and they don't feel this codependence, this requirement to nurture their significant other who has this life-threatening illness," said study researcher Dr. Marc Chamberlain, director of the neuro-oncology program at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance (SCCA), "but rather decide what's best for me is to find an alternative mate and abandon my fatally flawed spouse."

However, it seems that divorce is counterintuitive to what is best for the patient. Patients either divorced or separated had a higher rate of hospitalization, were less likely to look for alternative treatments, participate in clinical trials, complete treatment and more likely to die at home.


Monday, November 9, 2009

I Can Grow You A Penis-"Artificial Penis Tissue Proves Promising in Lab Tests"

Recent studies have shown that it may be possible to grow artificial penis tissue that one day could "enhance their normal penises, rather than repairing any damage."


However, scientists want the technology to help people with penile cancer, abnormalities, and traumatic injury.

The problem of reconstructing a penis, is that for something that seems to have an on/off switch, is that it is an incredibly complex organ. The tissue and skin cannot simply be replace, the intricate intracellular reactions must be restored for full penile glory.

Researches took smooth muscle and epithelial cells from erectile tissue of rabbit penises and allowed them to grow. Afterwards, the cells were injected onto a scaffold made from rabbit penises that had their cells removed. These scaffolds were then implanted onto 12 rabbits with tissue development with blood vessels forming a month later. Tests show that full function was restored with proper blood pressure, flow and drainage in the new organ. In future human applications, researches may not use decellularized penises, but instead materials such as collagen as a scaffold instead.

Rabbits were shown to have a healthy appetite to...act like rabbits when introduced to females and successfully impregnated a few.


Thursday, November 5, 2009

"Male Sabertoothed Cats Were Pussycats Compared to Macho Lions"


We remember sabertoothed tigers as being badass. I mean they had to be, they had awesome fangs and it had a Power Ranger!



As discussed in an earlier post, sexual dimorphism is common in many species. In the case of the prehistoric American lion, males were much bigger than females. However, tigers appeared to be the same size regardless of sex. Since neither cat exists today, how did scientists figure this out?

Fossils. And teeth. Although, you can easily sort fossils into groups based on size you have to consider that the animal grows over time. A bone from a young male could be the same size as an older females. Instead, researchers x-rayed the lower teeth and jaw of American lions and sabertooths. As the cats grow, their hollow teeth become filled with dentin, giving an estimated age.

By plotting tooth cavity diameter and jaw length for both species, it was obvious that the size fell into two groups, regardless of age. There was clear evidence for sexual dimorphism--that the bigger teeth were male and the smaller ones were female. However, the tigers sizes were only based on age--that "males were indistinguishable from their mates."

What does that mean?

Well, there needs to be a evolutionary reason for having bigger males. Bigger males can compete and battle better than smaller ones for resources and females. So if the American lion had big males, then they were more aggressive in competition. Scientists theorized that the lions had 1-2 male-dominated groups of females. The sabertooth tiger, instead shows no real difference in size, suggesting that the males and females existed more equally with no reason for aggression.

Duke University (2009, November 5). Male Sabertoothed Cats Were Pussycats Compared To Macho Lions. ScienceDaily. Retrieved November 5, 2009, from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091105121050.htm

Watch Your Mouth Around Preggos--THE UNBORN CAN HEAR YOU


Don't all crying babies sound alike? Annoying??


It seems that those ear-splitting screams and coos can be a different melodies that are similar to the language that they were exposed to in womb during their last trimester. A new study published today online in Cell Biology suggests that a baby's cries are indicative of elements of the language they picked up and is part of language development.

It turns out that newborns are able to distinguish between different languages and pitch changes by relying on the melody. Fetuses are able to memorize sounds heard from the last trimester. As expected, newborns prefer their mother's voice over all other voices and can "perceive emotional content of messages" as conveyed through tone and pitch.

Thirty French and 30 German babies, 3-5 days old had their cries analyzed. It turned out the infants' cries were melodically different based on the language they were exposed to. Although earlier studies showed that infants can match vowel sounds from adult speakers when they are 12 weeks old, this type of control is not physically possible earlier. Infants may only be able imitate the melody of the ambient language which is theorized as a way for them to bond to their mothers.

Cell Press (2009, November 5). Babies' Language Learning Starts From The Womb.ScienceDaily. Retrieved November 5, 2009, from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091105092607.htm


Wednesday, November 4, 2009

China Can Make Snow At Will....Hey, Can You Send Some Flakes Over Here??


(Note: The above picture IS NOT China.)

Unlike so many here on the East Coast who hate the cold weather, I love it (minus the cold/flu season that accompanies it). I love the brisk weather and not sweating my (imaginary) balls off all the time. However something that tends to be disappointing season after season is the lack of any decent snow.

Well, seems China has decided not to wait around for some, it's went out and made its own.

On November 1st 2009, Beijing experienced it's first snowfall of the season which according to scientists, was the product of cloud seeding. IF that's true, then China has succeeded in producing real results in a experiment to solve drought conditions in certain parts of the country.

Clouds form around a condensation nuclei, some kind of particle such as dust that has been swept high into the cold parts of the atmosphere. At these lower temps, water condensates on and around the nuclei, forming clouds. No particles = no clouds = no percipitation.

Scientists in China have been experimenting with cloud-seeding, which artificially introduce condensation nuclei into the atmosphere. They used silver iodide introduced into the atmosphere, which quickly induces cloud formation because of their charge. Another advantage to this chemical is as the water bonds to the growing cloud, heat is released, drawing further moisture from the ground.

Did this actually work this time? Who knows. All we definitely know is that the storm was 11hrs long and bad enough to disrupt air travel. Also, let's not piss off the Chinese, we have enough tornadoes and freak storms over here let's not add random snow to it.

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

TV Possibly linked to Childhood Aggression

I guess some kids can't handle their cartoons.


TV exposure in three year olds seem to have an increased risk of aggressive behavior. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends no TV for children under 2, although television is the second media most children between 0 and 3 yr olds are exposed to.

This large study included 3,128 children and their parents, in 20 large U.S cities born between 1998 and 2000.

Parents were then interviewed when their child was born, at 1 year and at 3 years. At 3 years, they were also asked about how much TV their child watch as well as the household's average use. Aggression was determined on a 15-item scale. Risk factors and demographic informations were also included.

The results showed about 65% of moms said their 3yr old watched at least 2hrs of TV and was overall exposed to 5.2 hrs of household TV use a day. After accounting for other factors, direct and indirect TV exposure was significantly associated with childhood aggression.

"One explanation that could link both child and household TV measures with aggression involves the parenting environment," the authors write. Households with higher rates of TV use may have fewer restrictions on children's viewing habits such as exposure to unregulated television content. Increased household television use may also affect daily routines such as eating and communication patterns and may decrease time spent on other activities.

Monday, November 2, 2009

Your Face Is Too Angry

Keeping with the face trend here, research shows a link between facial width-to-height ration (WHR) and aggression.


The WHR measures from the right and left cheeks and the distance from the upper lip to mid-brow bone. The change between the sexes in WHR occurs during puberty, when males develop a greater ratio.

Research has shown people with higher WHR have more aggression than in those with smaller WHR. This has been supported by studies of hockey players--greater WHRs earned more penalty points per game.

Psychologists wanted to know if people can predict aggression based on faces alone. Volunteers rated faces of people who were already assessed for hostile behavior after looking at them for 2000milliseconds or 39milliseconds.

Surprisingly, volunteers were highly correct in guessing the assessed aggressive people and corresponded with those with high WHR.


Sunday, November 1, 2009

"Men's brains are wired for attraction to sexually dimorphic faces" "


Sexual dimorphism isn't as dirty as you think it sounds. It refers to the differences the sexes of the same species. For example, male peacocks are much more colorful than their female counterparts.


In humans, sexually dimorphic male faces have broad jaws and forehead and more pronounced brow ridge. Female faces have a tapered chin, larger lips and narrower forehead.


The results showed:
  • Gay men prefer highly masculine males faces rather than feminine males faces
  • Type of male faces found attractive by gay men did not agree with the types of male faces straight women thought were attractive
  • Gay men and straight men also did not agree on which male faces were attractive
  • Straight women like more masculine male faces than lesbians
  • Lesbian preferred more slightly masculine female faces than straight men and women
Previous research has shown women prefer more masculine males faces during ovulation, suggesting an evolutionary connection to human sexual dimorphism. Also, women's attractions are much more complicated then men as it depends on contraception use, self-perceptions, ovulation and sex drive.

The conclusion from this study is that men, regardless of orientation, prefer sexually dimorphic faces synoynmous with the gender they attracted to--gay men like masculine male faces and straight men like feminine female faces.

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Holy Crap!!: Asteroid Detonates Above Indonesia and No One Saw It


Did you know on October 8th, 2009 an asteroid exploded, releasing about 3x the energy of the Hiroshima atomic bomb, high in the atmosphere above Indonesia?


No? It's because literally no one saw it coming.

About 15-20 kilometers into the atmosphere, the explosion caused no damage on Earth, but witnesses could see a dust trail consistent with asteroid explosion. Nuclear explosion instruments around the world picked up the infrasound waves that resulted from the release of energy. The object is estimated to be about 10 meters across, as calculated by its energy output. No telescope saw it and that typically telescopes don't normally pick up objects less than a 100meters across-- only a small fraction of cataloged objects fit this description. However, it can take as little as 20-30 meter diameter object to cause major damage on Earth.

Ultimately, in order to find smaller objects we have to build larger, more powerful telescopes--a multibillion dollar endeavor. I think I'd rather spend a billion plus dollars than get squashed by a giant flying rock.



Using Women's Stockings as Whale Pregnancy Tests


As big as whales are, they are pretty hard to study and keep track of. Most techniques require to kill them in order to examine them. However, scientists think they have developed a way for them to collect biological samples from these animals test to see if they are pregnant or just horny.



Presumably, this would be a relatively simple, cheap and non-invasive way to get more information. To test this method, researchers in Austrailia collected 35 samples from two types of whales. They attached a stocking to a pole and then dangled it over the animals' blowhole when they came up for air. Tada! Whale blow soaked nylons!

Although scientists originally thought whale blow was simply air and water, it actually includes lung mucus. So instead of whales simply blowing air out, they are actually sort of sneezing. Measurable levels of the hormones progesterone and testosterone were also present in the blow, allowing scientists to figure out the sexual health of the animal.

For example, whales that were coming back from tropical waters, where they are thought to breed and bore offspring actually were still hormonally in the breeding period. In the long term sense, scientists hope to discover why certain whales are unable to breed.


Thursday, October 22, 2009

I'm Addicted to Cheesecake...Literally.

We've all had those moments, where we've eaten an entire package of oreos, a pint of ice cream or huge super-sized meal from McDonald's.



New research from the Scripps Research Institute in Florida suggests that junk food addiction is surprisingly similar to drug addiction.

Rats were split into two groups: Controls which had high-nutrient/low-cal diets or Junkies who were given unlimited junk food bought in a local grocery store (ie bacon, cheesecake, ho-hos, sausage, etc.). As expected, the junkie rats quickly became obese and compulsive eaters.

The rats were then allowed to control the pleasure center of their brains (also associated with drug addiction) by running on a wheel. The more they ran, the better they felt. Rats on the high fat diet ran more demonstrating that they need more stimulation in order to feel pleasure.

To see how strong the urge to eat junk food was, the rats were shocked whenever they ate high-fat foods. Control rats refused to eat the food again after one shock. However, the obese rats continually ate despite the repeated discomfort.

Furthermore, when the rats were put back onto the strict control diet, they had much difficulty adjusting. Formerly junky rats refused to eat their new food and starved themselves for two weeks.

Scientists are now interested in seeing if the eating habits of these junky rats are affected in the long term sense.


Put THAT away!: Can Men Control Their Arousal?

As both sexes can know unwelcomed...um...boners are awkward. Super awkward. I know most girls assume that this an uncontrolled response. Sexyness = erection. However, what if men can control it?


Then they'd be liars and or too lazy to bother.

Researchers showed men 16 random clips of which 8 were erotic and 8 were funny featuring comedian Mitch Hedberg (to remove the accidental sexy factor). The participants were then ordered to control their response to certain videos while freely watching others. They then were asked to rate their arousal. Also during the study, there were hooked to machines measuring their erections.

On average, men were able to control their response when asked, resulting in about a 25% decrease in erectile response. One scientist notes that "This is consistent with success rates from previous, well-controlled [measuring-device] faking studies in which success rates range from 26 to 38 percent." Men who were able to control themselves when watching porn videos also able to do so while watching Mitch Hedberg.

“The finding that was most surprising was that some men became more sexually aroused when they tried to regulate their sexual arousal,” Winters says. “In other words, they responded more strongly (both physiologically and self-reported) during trials in which they attempted to regulate their arousal than trials during which they merely watched the stimuli. We attributed this increased response to anxiety — in this case, demand anxiety. It’s sort of like when you tell someone not to think of a white elephant; those [who] are most anxious during the task have the most trouble not thinking about the white elephant.”

It appeared that the factors that DID NOT affect ability to regulate were:
-sexual experience
-sexual compulsivity
-age
However, the following factors DID affect it:
-sexual excitability
-desire
-inhibition

So the next time girls, when they say "I can't help it!" just go "Maybe you aren't trying hard enough!!"



Thursday, October 15, 2009

I CAN STOP LIFE!: Using hydrogen sulfide to halt cell activity

If you read this blog regularly, we've been a little lax in posting lately. Really, there's hasn't been anything reported that's interesting in science going on. I know, you'd think that was impossible.

---------------------------------------------------------
If you've ever taken a chemistry class, you've probably gotten a whiff of H2S, or hydrogen sulfide. And if you don't know what I'm talking about, it smells like rotten eggs. I bet you know what I'm talking about now.

In low doses, H2S gas is tolerable. Hydrogen sulfide is naturally occurring, so your body can process lower levels. In high doses, it will kill you. The toxicity comes from the gas binding to your enzymes instead of oxygen. And you sorta need oxygen to live.

Scientists are now experimenting with the deadly gas in order to stop cell growth and further the field of emergency medicine. A recent breakthrough has been that death isn't caused be oxygen deprivation directly, but falling oxygen levels set off deadly reactions. However, hydrogen sulfide can replace the oxygen and stop the reactions before they occur.

Experiments with fish embryos showed that removing oxygen from their cells left them in suspension. When oxygen was added back, they cells simply continued to grow as normal without any difference. Next, fruit flies were gassed with H2S. They also stopped moving but started up again over oxygen was added back.

The theory is that we need at least 21% oxygen to live (this is the composition of the air we breathe) and die at 5%. However, at .1% cells appear to simply stop, not die. As you can imagine, this can revolutionize medicine as we no longer need to race against time, but just pause it. However, research is having a problem achieving this suspended animation with big animals. Currently, they are developing an injectable drug that will dissolve in the blood to release H2S.

As reported from CNN.

Thursday, October 8, 2009

Wait.. We are Bombing the Moon!?


A crater toward the Moon's south pole is currently targeted by a missle (called the Centaur rocket) in hopes of figuring out if the Moon could be a potential future source of water.

Science Fan James Howard says, "Bombing the moon will be sweet because it will show any aliens watching that we mean business . . . my sources have also said that we could be secretly laying the foundation for a moon golf course or mini-golf course, which would also be sweet."

The impact is expected to be so powerful that a very large amount of debris will be ejected. Although the surface of the moon has been determined to be mostly a desert like environment (dry and airless), scientists believe there could be a basin of ice trapped in the crater where the Centaur rocket is being aimed. If there is ice it could be enough water to fill one of Europe's largest reservoirs providing a temporary fix to the diminishing water supply globally.

Following close behind the missile is a shepherding space craft that will be used to take pictures of the impact as well as monitor the
missile's activity. At the same time a satellite is being launched that is designed to orbit the Moon for at least a year searching for potential landing sites for astronauts for return missions and monitor the area for suitable conditions to support a colony.

Coincidently, China's is also sending a probe that is scheduled to crash into the moon this week. Hopefully we know what we are doing. The poor moon.

Source: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=nasas-mission-to-bomb-the-moon-2009-06

Some people don't like this idea: http://donotbombthemoon.wordpress.com/

Astronomers on Verge of Finding Earth's Twin

ARTICLE TAKEN FROM: http://www.livescience.com/space/080624-st-planet-tally.html

" Planet hunters say it's just a matter of time before they lasso Earth's twin, which almost surely is hiding somewhere in our star-studded galaxy.

Momentum is building: Just last week, astronomers announced they had discovered three super-Earths — worlds more massive than ours but small enough to most likely be rocky — orbiting a single star. And dozens of other worlds suspected of having masses in that same range were found around other stars.

"Being able to find three Earth-mass planets around a single star really makes the point that not only may many stars have one Earth, but they may very well have a couple of Earths," said Alan Boss, a planet formation theorist at the Carnegie Institution of Washington in Washington, D.C.

Since the early 1990s, when the first planets outside of our solar system were detected orbiting the pulsar PSR 1257, astronomers have identified nearly 300 such worlds. However, most of them are gas giants called hot Jupiters that orbit close to their stars because, simply, they are easier to find.

"So far we've found Jupiters and Saturns, and now our technology is becoming good enough to detect planets smaller, more like the size of Uranus and Neptune, and even smaller," said one of the top planet hunters on this world, Geoff Marcy of the University of California, Berkeley.

Marcy, Boss and other scientists are optimistic that within the next five or so years headlines will be splashed with news of a near twin of Earth in another star system.

"What is amazing to me is that for thousands of years humans have gazed at the stars, wondering if there might be another Earth out there somewhere," Boss told SPACE.com. "Now we know enough to say that Earth-like planets are indeed orbiting many of those stars, unseen perhaps, but there nevertheless."

Seeing tiny planets

Two techniques are now standard for spotting other worlds. Most of the planets noted to date have been discovered using the radial velocity method, in which astronomers look for slight wobbles in a star's motion due to the gravitational tug of an orbiting planet. This favors detection of very massive planets that are very close to their host stars.

With the transit method, astronomers watch for a dimming of light when a planet passes in front of its host star. Though more haphazard, this approach works when telescopes scan the light from hundreds or thousands of stars at once.

Both methods are limited by their ability to block out the overshadowing light of the host star. For instance, the sun is 100 times larger, 300,000 times more massive and up to 10 billion times brighter than Earth. "Detecting Earth in reflected light is like searching for a firefly six feet from a searchlight that is 2,400 miles distant," writes a panel of astronomers recently in their final report of the Exoplanet Task Force.

With upgrades in spectrometers and digital cameras attached to telescopes, astronomers' eyes have become more sensitive to relatively tiny stellar wobbles (measured by changes in certain wavelengths of light) and dips in starlight from ever smaller planets.

The discovery of super-Earths announced last week reflects this technological leap.

"I think why astronomers are really excited [about the super-Earth discovery] is it just shows that technology has really matured and so they're able to see these very subtle wobbles due to these low-mass planets," said David Charbonneau of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Massachusetts. "Those were fairly massive stars. If they were able to get the same precision on a lower-mass star, they would be able to look at even lower-mass planets and so those really would be analogs of the Earth."

The fast track

To eke out even more sensitivity from current technologies, Charbonneau suggests astronomers look for worlds around small stars.

He and other astronomers are in fact probing the universe for transiting planets orbiting M dwarfs, or red dwarfs, which are about 50 percent dimmer than the sun and much less massive. Red dwarfs are also considered the most common star type in the universe.

"I think the real opportunity there is to study low-mass stars, and that's because we're looking for very small planets," Charbonneau said. "The difficulty is the ratio between the planet's mass and the star's mass or the planet's size and the star's size depending on how you want to find it."

The low mass and luminosity means any changes to the star due to an Earth-mass planet are much more likely to be detected.

"A late M star is about 10 times smaller than the sun," said Penn State's James Kasting, who studies planetary atmospheres and the habitable zones of exoplanets. "So Earth going in front of an M star would give a 1 percent signal. That's like Jupiter going in front of the sun." Kasting added, "We could conceivably find an Earth analog planet by this method within the next five or ten years."

Other teams are gearing up to look for Earth-like worlds orbiting massive stars like the sun. NASA's Kepler observatory is scheduled for launch in February 2009, after which the high-powered telescope will monitor about 100,000 stars in the Milky Way looking for periodic dimming of starlight due to a planet's transit in front of the star.

The French COROT mission is already up in space working in a similar fashion.

Good hunting

The ultimate goal of planet-hunting projects is to find Earth twins.

"We are looking for twins of the Earth, analogs that walk and talk and smell like our own Earth," Marcy said during a telephone interview. He is currently looking for super-Earths using the W.M. Keck Observatory in Hawaii.

Such a twin would be rocky, with a similar chemical composition to Earth, and would orbit within the habitable zone of its star.

The habitable zone defines the distance at which a planet must orbit from its star for liquid water to exist on its surface — not too hot like Venus, not too cold like Neptune or Pluto.

Astronomers have found planets orbiting pretty close to the habitable zone, but none so far within it.

"I suspect there are Earth-like planets with lakes and rivers and waterfalls and deep glacial gorges and that are spectacularly beautiful," Marcy said.

Life beyond Earth

Finding a planet in the habitable zone is the first step toward finding alien life.

"When we say it's a habitable world, all we're doing is saying it potentially could hold life," Boss said. "To go beyond that to say, 'Here's a habitable world; is it inhabited,' then you need to start studying the atmosphere of the planet."

The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), scheduled for launch in 2013, could do just that.

"There might be a signal in the atmosphere that could be a smoking gun and would suggest that plate tectonics is there," said earth and planetary scientist Diana Valencia of Harvard University.

Her computer models have shown that plate tectonics, the forces that move continents and lift gigantic mountain ranges, are key to life on Earth as we know it, and possibly to life on other worlds. That's because as the rocky plates that form the planet's outer shell move about, they also recycle carbon dioxide. This greenhouse gas keeps our planet's temperature balmy, but not too hot. And the telltale signal would be certain levels of carbon dioxide, suggesting that just as on Earth, this other world relies on plate tectonics to cycle carbon.

But first things first. "There's no doubt that other Earths exist, simply due to the sheer vast numbers of other stars and galaxies in our universe," Marcy said. "There's a deeper question — how common are Earth-like planets? Are Earth-like planets a dime a dozen, or are they quite rare, quirky precious planets that are one in a thousand or one in a million?" "